RESUMEN
Melanoma is still a major health problem worldwide. Early diagnosis is the first step toward reducing its mortality, but it remains a challenge even for experienced dermatologists. Although computer-aided systems have been developed to help diagnosis, the lack of insight into their predictions is still a significant limitation toward acceptance by the medical community. To tackle this issue, we designed handcrafted expert features representing color asymmetry within the lesions, which are parts of the approach used by dermatologists in their daily practice. These features are given to an artificial neural network classifying between nevi and melanoma. We compare our results with an ensemble of 7 state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks and merge the 2 approaches by computing the average prediction. Our experiments are done on a subset of the International Skin Imaging Collaboration 2019 dataset (6296 nevi, 1361 melanomas). The artificial neural network based on asymmetry achieved an area under the curve of 0.873, sensitivity of 90%, and specificity of 67%; the convolutional neural network approach achieved an area under the curve of 0.938, sensitivity of 91%, and specificity of 82%; and the fusion of both approaches achieved an area under the curve of 0.942, sensitivity of 92%, and specificity of 82%. Merging the knowledge of dermatologists with convolutional neural networks showed high performance for melanoma detection, encouraging collaboration between computer science and medical fields.
RESUMEN
Early detection of melanoma remains a daily challenge due to the increasing number of cases and the lack of dermatologists. Thus, AI-assisted diagnosis is considered as a possible solution for this issue. Despite the great advances brought by deep learning and especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs), computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems are still not used in clinical practice. This may be explained by the dermatologist's fear of being misled by a false negative and the assimilation of CNNs to a "black box", making their decision process difficult to understand by a non-expert. Decision theory, especially game theory, is a potential solution as it focuses on identifying the best decision option that maximizes the decision-maker's expected utility. This study presents a new framework for automated melanoma diagnosis. Pursuing the goal of improving the performance of existing systems, our approach also attempts to bring more transparency in the decision process. The proposed framework includes a multi-class CNN and six binary CNNs assimilated to players. The players' strategies is to first cluster the pigmented lesions (melanoma, nevus, and benign keratosis), using the introduced method of evaluating the confidence of the predictions, into confidence level (confident, medium, uncertain). Then, a subset of players has the strategy to refine the diagnosis for difficult lesions with medium and uncertain prediction. We used EfficientNetB5 as the backbone of our networks and evaluated our approach on the public ISIC dataset consisting of 8917 lesions: melanoma (1113), nevi (6705) and benign keratosis (1099). The proposed framework achieved an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.93 for melanoma, 0.96 for nevus and 0.97 for benign keratosis. Furthermore, our approach outperformed existing methods in this task, improving the balanced accuracy (BACC) of the best compared method from 77% to 86%. These results suggest that our framework provides an effective and explainable decision-making strategy. This approach could help dermatologists in their clinical practice for patients with atypical and difficult-to-diagnose pigmented lesions. We also believe that our system could serve as a didactic tool for less experienced dermatologists.
